Science at risk of being strangled

Science at risk of being strangled

The Australian Government is trying to push through reforms that will tell us how to spend your donations.   

The proposed reforms include directing all environmental charities to spend at least 25% of their funds on direct environmental remediation, such as tree planting and weed control.

Forcing charities who have no experience or expertise in environmental remediation to spend 25% of their funds is draconian and anti-democratic. Charities are experts in their issue area and should independently decide their activities.

Research, education, communications, media and advocacy undertaken by environmental charities, like the Climate Council, is critical. It should not be undermined ...

The Australian Government is trying to push through reforms that will tell us how to spend your donations.   

The proposed reforms include directing all environmental charities to spend at least 25% of their funds on direct environmental remediation, such as tree planting and weed control.

Forcing charities who have no experience or expertise in environmental remediation to spend 25% of their funds is draconian and anti-democratic. Charities are experts in their issue area and should independently decide their activities.

Research, education, communications, media and advocacy undertaken by environmental charities, like the Climate Council, is critical. It should not be undermined.

This is a challenge to our democracy. Together we have stood up before to the stifling of science and democratic debate. It is time to do so again.

+

Send an Email

Can you help us fight back against the proposed reforms that will force environmental groups to spend 25% of their funding on remediation work by sending an email to your Local Member of Parliament? 

Compose your email